Red Dead Redemption
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, Arcanis, $iljanus
- Octavious
- Posts: 20049
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I think I was only at 89% when I finished the main story. Took me almost exactly 25 hours and I kind of powered through the second half so it could have taken much longer. Well worth the 60 bucks! Can't wait to see what DLC they provide for this as I can think of a ton of cool things they could do. (A whole storyline of the grownup son, The early life of the main character, The Sheriff could have his own storyline etc...)
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56060
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: Red Dead Redemption
There is a lot of detail that isn't used. I spend 20 minutes admiring the railroad camp and I think I only had to go there once during the normal course of the game.Octavious230 wrote:Can't wait to see what DLC they provide for this as I can think of a ton of cool things they could do.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- YellowKing
- Posts: 31184
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I plan on knocking out Alan Wake over the next week or so then going back to try for 100% completion in RDR.
- Octavious
- Posts: 20049
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Forgot to mention the thing that impressed me most in the game. The wildlife.. Holy crap when a bear comes at you it's f'n terrifying. I don't recall any other game getting it so perfect.
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
- Kyosho
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:12 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Hah!YellowKing wrote:Spoiler:
Spoiler:
- Doomboy
- Posts: 2808
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:48 pm
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I tried that "cheat". The damn bear ran away and found his big brother. They had fun with their new chew toy.LawBeefaroni wrote:I rolled around in circles swinging away like crazy with the knife. Had to use a few medicines. Fortunately it saves right after because some boars apparently didn't like what I gone and done and they killt me after the skinning animation.
Or you can "cheat"Spoiler:
Edit: As I think back on it, it was rather amusing. Me chasing this huge grizzly bear through the woods swinging a knife at it. Occasionally it would look over it's shoulder to see if the crazy bad man was still chasing him. We almost ran off a cliff at one point, I think. It sorta felt like that scene in Star Wars where Han is chasing the squad of stormtroopers through the halls of the deathstar.
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 56210
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I mentioned it earlier but this game has taught me that there is a definitely a bear Ninja clan and that all bears hunt in packs of three. I am pretty sure 80% of my deaths in-game were due to a bear attack.
I do keep seeing that the music (start of Mexico, reunion) is wonky which is too bad. I had all the music play for me and I think it added a lot to the overall experience.
I was also seeing that R* has acknowledged some problems with MP so I'm hopeful that they're going to tweak and patch it to the point where maybe I can play without having to somehow magically configure my router.
I do keep seeing that the music (start of Mexico, reunion) is wonky which is too bad. I had all the music play for me and I think it added a lot to the overall experience.
I was also seeing that R* has acknowledged some problems with MP so I'm hopeful that they're going to tweak and patch it to the point where maybe I can play without having to somehow magically configure my router.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Terrified
- Posts: 1606
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:26 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I did it a bit differently...YellowKing wrote:Spoiler:
Spoiler:
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56060
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Patch today fixed the Mo Van Barr bug for certain pre-order swag and lowered the experience rate for hideouts in multiplayer. Not sure that it did anything else.Smoove_B wrote:I mentioned it earlier but this game has taught me that there is a definitely a bear Ninja clan and that all bears hunt in packs of three. I am pretty sure 80% of my deaths in-game were due to a bear attack.
I do keep seeing that the music (start of Mexico, reunion) is wonky which is too bad. I had all the music play for me and I think it added a lot to the overall experience.
I was also seeing that R* has acknowledged some problems with MP so I'm hopeful that they're going to tweak and patch it to the point where maybe I can play without having to somehow magically configure my router.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- Jeremy
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:16 pm
- Location: Dayton, Ohio
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I'm playing through a second time after finishing the game around 96% complete. The first time through, I didn't make use of Dead Eye much until Level 3, so this time around it's quite a bit easier. I also must have missed the part of the tutorial on how to stop your galloping horse. (And god forbid I RTFM.)
I love the game and can only hope they add some single player depth to any additional content.
The downside is that I was only a quarter of the way through GTA IV when I got RDR and it's tough to go back. Weapons selection and targetting are so much better in RDR, not to mention movement and taking cover. I also hate how I've got to replay all of the travel to get to a failed mission in GTA whereas in RDR you pick up pretty much where you left off. It does give me hope for future GTA titles.
As for the ending:
I love the game and can only hope they add some single player depth to any additional content.
The downside is that I was only a quarter of the way through GTA IV when I got RDR and it's tough to go back. Weapons selection and targetting are so much better in RDR, not to mention movement and taking cover. I also hate how I've got to replay all of the travel to get to a failed mission in GTA whereas in RDR you pick up pretty much where you left off. It does give me hope for future GTA titles.
As for the ending:
Spoiler:
- Doomboy
- Posts: 2808
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:48 pm
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Endgame:
For some reason, even after the game has ended, I can't buy the rebel scrap in Mexico. I also can't do that damned knife game. So I guess I will never get 100%.
Spoiler:
-
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 1:46 am
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I got this for the xbox today. I had a hard time deciding between that version and the ps3 one but the higher resolution made my choice.
I'd enjoy the game but I have a brutal sound bug. The sound stutters in and out. Turning the music down helped a little, but it's still unbearably bad. Installing the the HD didn't help. Neither did turning down the resolution down to 720p
Anybody else experience this? Is it solvable?
I'd enjoy the game but I have a brutal sound bug. The sound stutters in and out. Turning the music down helped a little, but it's still unbearably bad. Installing the the HD didn't help. Neither did turning down the resolution down to 720p
Anybody else experience this? Is it solvable?
-
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 1:46 am
Re: Red Dead Redemption
SOLVED!Moggy123 wrote:I got this for the xbox today. I had a hard time deciding between that version and the ps3 one but the higher resolution made my choice.
I'd enjoy the game but I have a brutal sound bug. The sound stutters in and out. Turning the music down helped a little, but it's still unbearably bad. Installing the the HD didn't help. Neither did turning down the resolution down to 720p
Anybody else experience this? Is it solvable?
It was an amplifier issue. For what ever reason, my amplifier was switching back and forth between analog and digital. Changing from Auto Detect fixed the problem.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:41 am
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I finally finished last night with 69% completed. Yeah, I kinda just stuck to the main story missions. I was kinda dissappionted with the ending.
Really great game. My 360 GotY!
Spoiler:
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56060
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: Red Dead Redemption
JayDeath wrote:I finally finished last night with 69% completed. Yeah, I kinda just stuck to the main story missions. I was kinda dissappionted with the ending.Really great game. My 360 GotY!Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:41 am
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Thanks for info LB!
Spoiler:
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 56210
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Jose Gonzalez stopped by Rockstar NYC and played an acoustic version of Far Away on their roof.
At this point it's still GOTY for me.
At this point it's still GOTY for me.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Octavious
- Posts: 20049
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Ya the only bummer for me is that all the upcoming dlc isn't new story like they did for GTA4. I figured they would release a dlc where you could play the sheriff or something like that. Maybe they still will :fingers crossed:
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
-
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:41 pm
Re: Red Dead Redemption
So I finished this a little while back, and after all the hype, I was a little disappointed.
Don't get me wrong, its a good game, good enough that I finished the main story which I don't always do, but I think it had many flaws that have been largely overlooked by reviews.
My main beef is that there is such a big disconnect between the plot cut-scenes and the game itself. Basically you are watching a movie for half the game. It's a pretty good one, but you have no choice or effect on what is going on, in contrast to a game like Mass Effect 2. I feel like I spent half my time riding from point A to point B having a conversation with the NPCs, only, I didn't get to choose what I say.
Then, you are dropped into a long action sequence, after which its more riding and talking, or standing and talking.
And it's clear that the 'movie script' people and the 'game developer' people have a bit of a disconnect.
-------------------------------------------------------------
A second issue is the repeditiveness of the side-missions and 'open world' after the first 10 hours or so of gameplay. Especially by the time you get to the final map area, there is really nothing new. The same shops, the same gambling games, etc..
I am not motivated by 'collecting' or getting '%100' in my games, so perhaps this just wasn't for me.
But honestly I found the gameplay stayed a lot more 'fresh' in Assassin's Creed 2 than in RDR, which by the end, despite the great story, I was ready to finish and move on. AC2's side quests often had more impact on the game than what RDRs did (like hunting for the tombs). And I LOVE westerns, especially the type RDR bases itself on, but I still felt that AC2 was better as an open world game, and so was GTA 4, but GTA 4 suffers from the lack of checkpointing (a blessed addition for RDR). AC2's storytelling wasn't as good as RDR, but it also wasn't as intrusive, I didn't feel like I was watching a movie between action scenes. And both it and GTA4 had activies that felt more meaningful or fun as part of the 'open world' mechanic.
------------------------------------------------------------
The collecting brings me to the general pointlessness of all the side activites. Don't get me wrong, most of the 'stranger' quests are pretty good. But the other things, like WTF am I gathering flowers and shooting beavers? Not only is it silly and again, disconnected from the revisionist western feel of the game, but its boring.
And the gambling? Its not bad but its not as good as an actual gambling game, and if you are semi-competent you can basically win at will at poker and the dice game. But since money is meaningless, doesn't really matter. I finished the game with more money than I knew what to do with.
------------------------------------------------------------
Another thing I missed: Music. Yeah there are the two reasonably nice tunes including Jose Gonazelez's at the end. And the incidental music if fine. But its too brief. The Sergio Leone movies that RDR is such a homage too are practically defined by their Ennio Morricone scores. I would have liked to have had some of that in the game.
So in the end, I enjoyed the game, I thought the story was well written, the setting was excellent and the action mechanics were well done, and the voice acting was top notch without stunt-casting. But I think Rockstar needs to be pushed for better integration of their story into the gameplay. More roleplaying and less 'interactive movie'. And I don't mean roleplaying like D&D stats-focused style, but rather, I'd like to be playing a role, and to have a part in telling my own story. In RDR I am playing a story that someone else has already written.
Don't get me wrong, its a good game, good enough that I finished the main story which I don't always do, but I think it had many flaws that have been largely overlooked by reviews.
My main beef is that there is such a big disconnect between the plot cut-scenes and the game itself. Basically you are watching a movie for half the game. It's a pretty good one, but you have no choice or effect on what is going on, in contrast to a game like Mass Effect 2. I feel like I spent half my time riding from point A to point B having a conversation with the NPCs, only, I didn't get to choose what I say.
Then, you are dropped into a long action sequence, after which its more riding and talking, or standing and talking.
And it's clear that the 'movie script' people and the 'game developer' people have a bit of a disconnect.
Spoiler:
A second issue is the repeditiveness of the side-missions and 'open world' after the first 10 hours or so of gameplay. Especially by the time you get to the final map area, there is really nothing new. The same shops, the same gambling games, etc..
I am not motivated by 'collecting' or getting '%100' in my games, so perhaps this just wasn't for me.
But honestly I found the gameplay stayed a lot more 'fresh' in Assassin's Creed 2 than in RDR, which by the end, despite the great story, I was ready to finish and move on. AC2's side quests often had more impact on the game than what RDRs did (like hunting for the tombs). And I LOVE westerns, especially the type RDR bases itself on, but I still felt that AC2 was better as an open world game, and so was GTA 4, but GTA 4 suffers from the lack of checkpointing (a blessed addition for RDR). AC2's storytelling wasn't as good as RDR, but it also wasn't as intrusive, I didn't feel like I was watching a movie between action scenes. And both it and GTA4 had activies that felt more meaningful or fun as part of the 'open world' mechanic.
------------------------------------------------------------
The collecting brings me to the general pointlessness of all the side activites. Don't get me wrong, most of the 'stranger' quests are pretty good. But the other things, like WTF am I gathering flowers and shooting beavers? Not only is it silly and again, disconnected from the revisionist western feel of the game, but its boring.
And the gambling? Its not bad but its not as good as an actual gambling game, and if you are semi-competent you can basically win at will at poker and the dice game. But since money is meaningless, doesn't really matter. I finished the game with more money than I knew what to do with.
------------------------------------------------------------
Another thing I missed: Music. Yeah there are the two reasonably nice tunes including Jose Gonazelez's at the end. And the incidental music if fine. But its too brief. The Sergio Leone movies that RDR is such a homage too are practically defined by their Ennio Morricone scores. I would have liked to have had some of that in the game.
So in the end, I enjoyed the game, I thought the story was well written, the setting was excellent and the action mechanics were well done, and the voice acting was top notch without stunt-casting. But I think Rockstar needs to be pushed for better integration of their story into the gameplay. More roleplaying and less 'interactive movie'. And I don't mean roleplaying like D&D stats-focused style, but rather, I'd like to be playing a role, and to have a part in telling my own story. In RDR I am playing a story that someone else has already written.
Currently Playing: FM 2011, Football Manager Live, Fallout:New Vegas, Assasin's Creed: Brotherhood
- Kyosho
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:12 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Just in case... Did you see credits? If you didn't, the game's not over.Erithtotl wrote:In the final sequence...
As far as the side stuff, well, I rarely do that stuff in these sorts of games. And the issues you had with their storytelling methods didn't bother me either. Then again, some of my favorite games are pure adventures, which are probably as linear as you can get.
-
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:41 pm
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Yeah, I know, but once the plot is over what is there left to do? Collect flowers....Kyosho wrote:Just in case... Did you see credits? If you didn't, the game's not over.Erithtotl wrote:In the final sequence...
As far as the side stuff, well, I rarely do that stuff in these sorts of games. And the issues you had with their storytelling methods didn't bother me either. Then again, some of my favorite games are pure adventures, which are probably as linear as you can get.
Currently Playing: FM 2011, Football Manager Live, Fallout:New Vegas, Assasin's Creed: Brotherhood
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56060
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I think Kyosho is trying to say that there is a quest that rolls the credits. That is the "final sequence."Erithtotl wrote:Yeah, I know, but once the plot is over what is there left to do? Collect flowers....Kyosho wrote:Just in case... Did you see credits? If you didn't, the game's not over.Erithtotl wrote:In the final sequence...
As far as the side stuff, well, I rarely do that stuff in these sorts of games. And the issues you had with their storytelling methods didn't bother me either. Then again, some of my favorite games are pure adventures, which are probably as linear as you can get.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- Kyosho
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:12 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Red Dead Redemption
What he said. You have something left to do. Do you not? Think about it.
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56060
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Ok, hearing that Undead Nightmare is better than RDR vanilla.
May have to stay in tonight.
I mean there...are...Sasquatches!
May have to stay in tonight.
I mean there...are...Sasquatches!
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20799
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I couldn't find a demo for this...is there one?
Also, any deals? I'm 98% PC gamer, and I just DO NOT pay $50 for a game, no matter how good it is.
Also, any deals? I'm 98% PC gamer, and I just DO NOT pay $50 for a game, no matter how good it is.
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56060
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Well, I'm about 30% through Undead Nightmare. Worth the $10, easily.
I'd call it a "total conversion." At the single player menu screen you have the choice of regular RDR or Undead Nightmare. When you select Undead Nightmare you start a new game. Timeline-wise, it's sometime after Marston's homecoming.
Very survival horror and I'm dying a lot more than I did during the regular game (although that could be also going into UN after months off and not really remembering the controls). Undead bears are a bitch.
You get new sharpshooter, treasure hunter, and hunting challenges, as well as 2 outfits. You don't keep your challenge bonuses from regular RDR.
I'd call it a "total conversion." At the single player menu screen you have the choice of regular RDR or Undead Nightmare. When you select Undead Nightmare you start a new game. Timeline-wise, it's sometime after Marston's homecoming.
Very survival horror and I'm dying a lot more than I did during the regular game (although that could be also going into UN after months off and not really remembering the controls). Undead bears are a bitch.
You get new sharpshooter, treasure hunter, and hunting challenges, as well as 2 outfits. You don't keep your challenge bonuses from regular RDR.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- Apollo
- Posts: 1822
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:57 pm
- Location: Gardendale, AL
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I'm not "online" with my X-box, so my only choice was to buy the disc from Wal-Mart. But $29.95?! I understood that it would cost more than $10 since I'm buying a physical copy, but three times as much? Guess I'll be waiting a while to play the Undead add-on.
BTW, RDR won a slew of awards from Gamespot in their "Best Games of 2010" story. More than any other game!
BTW, RDR won a slew of awards from Gamespot in their "Best Games of 2010" story. More than any other game!
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 56210
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: Red Dead Redemption
That does seem a bit pricey considering they dropped the cost of the base game to ~$35. I remember seeing Undead Nightmare on sale for around $19 around the time it was released. I'm guessing some type of gold version will come out this summer for around $40 and I'll get it then.
Absolutely my GotY for 2010.
Absolutely my GotY for 2010.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Kyosho
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:12 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Ditto. If they do end up releasing a version with both I will pick it up. I only rented the main game from Gamefly when I played it. Haven't gotten around to Undead Nightmare.Smoove_B wrote:Absolutely my GotY for 2010.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 46117
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: Red Dead Redemption
And...
Red Dead Redemption and Undead Nightmare Coming to PC October 29
That's a short-notice announcement, but I never did get around to finishing it on the XB360. Hopefully they don't GTA San Andreas it.
Also, no mention of platforms. Hopefully they put it on Steam and not just on Rockstar's launcher.
Red Dead Redemption and Undead Nightmare Coming to PC October 29
That's a short-notice announcement, but I never did get around to finishing it on the XB360. Hopefully they don't GTA San Andreas it.
Also, no mention of platforms. Hopefully they put it on Steam and not just on Rockstar's launcher.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- Rumpy
- Posts: 13090
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:52 pm
- Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Re: Red Dead Redemption
That's a holy-shit moment if I ever saw one. Then again, good things come to those who wait.
As for platforms, the announcement says this:
As for platforms, the announcement says this:
Check out the new trailer above and stay tuned for more details, including information later this week on how to pre-purchase Red Dead Redemption and Undead Nightmare at the Rockstar Store, Steam, or the Epic Games Store.
PC:
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti
- Max Peck
- Posts: 15039
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:09 pm
- Location: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Now listed on Steam (and elsewhere, presumably).
"What? What? What?" -- The 14th Doctor
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
- jztemple2
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:52 am
- Location: Brevard County, Florida, USA
Re: Red Dead Redemption
It's a bit pricey.
My father said that anything is interesting if you bother to read about it - Michael C. Harrold
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 46117
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I was going to be waiting for reviews anyway (after the GTA trilogy debacle), but at that price point I'll either wait for a sale, or wait until I'm ready to actually sit down and play it (whichever comes first.)
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- Max Peck
- Posts: 15039
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:09 pm
- Location: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Re: Red Dead Redemption
For me, it also doesn't help that this is releasing just 2 days before Dragon Age: The Veilguard. I'm not inclined to pick it up for full price at release and then immediately relegate it to the backlog.
"What? What? What?" -- The 14th Doctor
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
- Daehawk
- Posts: 65786
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Im not buying into it for sure.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
When in doubt, skewer it out...I don't know.
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
When in doubt, skewer it out...I don't know.
- Grifman
- Posts: 22038
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I'm excited but I'll probably wait for a sale - maybe.
But which should I play first, RDR or RDR2? Should I play them in order of release or in order of the time line?
I'm thinking I should play RDR first, mainly because after playing RDR2, RDR would probably be a step down in gameplay, which might be frustrating or disappointing.
But which should I play first, RDR or RDR2? Should I play them in order of release or in order of the time line?
I'm thinking I should play RDR first, mainly because after playing RDR2, RDR would probably be a step down in gameplay, which might be frustrating or disappointing.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 46117
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: Red Dead Redemption
I'd agree with that. And (having played, but not finished, both), references are going to be tied to release order, not chronological order.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- Rumpy
- Posts: 13090
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:52 pm
- Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Re: Red Dead Redemption
Except for the epilogues in both games. Seeing as RDR2 is actually a prequel to the first game, RDR2's epilogue leads directly into RDR.
PC:
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti
Ryzen 5 3600
32GB RAM
2x1TB NVMe Drives
GTX 1660 Ti